Candidate campaign page: http://www.tricia4assembly.com/

Tricia Robbins Kasson serves as the Economic Development Director to Councilmember Bob Blumenfield (who Bike The Vote L.A. endorsed in 2017). She served as the point person for Blumenfield for the LA Great Streets Sherman Way project, which sought to improve the pedestrian experience within the Reseda commercial stretch. Her response to Bike The Vote L.A.’s questionnaire shows a deep understanding of the connections between safe streets, quality transit, affordable housing, and greenhouse gas reductions. With her commitments to improve funding for active transportation and to prioritize safety, Robbins Kasson would serve as an effective advocate for safe streets in the Assembly.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A-

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

In California’s urban areas, including the 45th Assembly District, the issue of sustainable transportation is inextricably intertwined with other issues. California’s affordable housing crisis means that working families face long commutes that make transit, walking, or biking infeasible. In the West San Fernando Valley, much of our peak-hour congestion is caused by commutes from Western Ventura County, Simi Valley, and the Antelope and Santa Clarita Valleys. I will work to make it easier to create middle income housing to relieve this kind of transit. Similarly, I will ensure that our schools and community colleges are adequately funded and provide quality education, so parents can send their children to schools within a walkable or bikeable distance.

While most land use decisions are local, as an Assemblymember I will promote land use policies such as those in the Warner Center 2035 plan, which I helped to develop and implement, that focus intensive development in concentrated areas that are well-served by high-quality transit.

For major highway and transit projects, I will work to ensure that Caltrans and other agencies focus on providing access for all transportation modes along the corridor, instead of focusing narrowly on the specific project. For example, in $1B widening of the 405 through the Sepulveda Pass (which did not reduce peak-hour congestion at all), a small portion of that funding should have been used to construct continuous bike lanes through the Sepulveda Pass.

I will work to ensure adequate funding for the Active Transportation Program, and to secure necessary funding for the Los Angeles River Valley Bikeway.

I grew up in the San Fernando Valley, and used transit, biking and walking to get to school, parks, libraries and other places.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Yes. Unfortunately, the funds generated by the state’s cap and trade program do not begin to meet the demand for worthwhile greenhouse gas reduction projects and programs. Nevertheless, it is unacceptable that, since the beginning of the cap and trade program, only $10 million (out of more than $4 billion) has been dedicated to the Active Transportation Program. Because bicycle infrastructure projects, in particular, often require design modifications during the planning and implementation process, it is important to have funding sources that are better able to accommodate such changes (which federal funding sources often do not). A dedicated source of State funds for active transportation will become increasingly necessary as Republicans in Washington DC seek to roll back or eliminate federal funding for such projects.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

I strongly support complete streets policies, and believe that our overall transportation network must better incorporate the needs of those who walk, bike and use transit. I do not, however, support a blanket policy of requiring every individual project funded from SB1 to be designed to incorporate pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities. California is a huge state, with widely-diverse transportation needs. In rural, mountainous areas, designing and constructing a highway project to accommodate pedestrians—where there are none—could involve a significant expense with no real benefit, which diverts funds from real needs elsewhere. On a local level, in the 45th District, Victory Boulevard runs across the San Fernando Valley, close to (and often adjacent to) the Orange Line and LA River bike paths, and it would not be a prudent use of funds (or sound policy) to include bicycle facilities should Victory be reconstructed under SB1.

This question strikes a larger point: how we ensure that the infusion of SB1 funds to address long-neglected infrastructure needs is used to create a more inclusive transportation network, and not merely re-create a solely auto-oriented system. The Complete Streets Act  requires local jurisdictions to develop multimodal networks in the circulation element of their General Plans. There are, however, few tools to ensure compliance with those plans. While every project might not need to be a “complete streets” project, every SB1-funded project should comply with the local circulation element. Also, every project on a street with a bus route should include elements to incorporate the needs of transit users. Local jurisdictions should be required to report on their progress toward implementing their complete streets networks, similar to reporting on their progress toward the Regional Housing Needs Assessment.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Yes. California’s traffic safety laws should be written in plain English so they can be easily understood by the public, whether they are driving or bicycling, and easily enforced by law enforcement personnel. On nearly all streets in the 45th Assembly District, the curb lane is too narrow for a motorist and bicyclist to share. However, the existing language of Vehicle Code section 21202, which requires people on bicycles to “ride as close practicable to the right,” is dangerous. It encourages people on bicycles to weave in and out of traffic around parked cars, to ride in the “door zone” too closely to parked cars, and generally make themselves less visible and less predictable to those driving motor vehicles. Conversely, it also encourages people driving to pass those on bikes too closely, in violation of Vehicle Code 21760, and leads to harassment of people on bicycles. It is all too uncommon for a driver to yell “ride to the right” as they buzz by a vulnerable person on a bicycle. I support Vision Zero efforts to eliminate traffic fatalities and reduce serious traffic injuries.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

I would support a pilot automated speed enforcement program in California. Street racing and excessive speeding are a serious problem in the 45th Assembly District, where there are many broad, straight streets with widely-spaced traffic signals and (outside rush hour) relatively low traffic volumes. Recent multiple-fatality collisions include a November 2016 crash in Woodland Hills adjacent to a schoolyard full of children, and a June 2016 crash in a thriving commercial district on Ventura Boulevard. In the West San Fernando Valley, the Los Angeles Police Department does not have sufficient resources to devote to traffic enforcement and excessive speeding.

However, there are legitimate questions about the effectiveness of ASE, including how well it works on busy suburban streets (as opposed to limited-access highways), the amount over the speed limit that would trigger a ticket, and whether deployment at limited locations increases traffic volumes or speeding to parallel streets; privacy concerns regarding the manner in which data is collected and stored; and whether ASE would be deployed solely to maximize safety and not to generate revenue. Such questions should be addressed through a well-designed pilot program, before widespread implementation takes place.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

California’s housing crisis must be addressed, and that can best be done by adopting policies that make it easier to build more housing, in appropriate locations. It is especially important to facilitate the construction of “missing middle” housing that is affordable to hard-working families who make too much to qualify for subsidized housing and cannot afford luxury housing. I strongly support policies that allow for more housing to be built near high-quality transit, and in areas with a concentration of stores, restaurants, services and other amenities that can be accessed by walking or bicycling. I am especially proud of my work in developing and implementing the Warner Center 2035 Specific Plan, which allows for intensive development in an area that is well-served by the Orange Line and other transit, and includes plans for improving walking, biking and a local transit circulator.

The Warner Center 2035 Specific Plan should be a model. Importantly, it is also an example of a policy that respects local control over land use issues. It was adopted through extensive community engagement in which many local residents came to accept intensive development at the Warner Center in exchange for a promise that the City of Los Angeles would protect low-density suburban neighborhoods. By preempting local control in areas, like Woodland Hills, that are meeting the need for additional housing and growth, SB 827 goes too far, at least as currently written.

Candidate campaign page: https://ankurforassembly.com/

With a Master’s Degree in Transportation Planning, it should come as no surprise that Ankur Patel is well versed in the benefits of active transportation and the challenges in providing quality mobility options. Patel’s enthusiastic support for reworking traffic laws to provide better clarity related to biking is particularly encouraging. We were also impressed with his commitment to, “make our cities more walkable and bikeable not only to reduce our dependence on cars and fossil fuels, but also to improve equity, livability, and community.” Through Patel’s words, it’s evident that he would make a strong supporter for active transportation options in the California Assembly.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A-

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

I think it is crucial to do everything we can to dismantle and replace single-occupancy car culture with something more sustainable. I earned a Master’s Degree in Transportation Planning from Cal State University Northridge. While I was working on my thesis I served on the CSUN Sustainability Department’s Transportation Working Group (TWG). One of the projects we worked on was designing and implementing a bicycle (and skateboard) lane network that has since expanded all around the campus and set the stage for the Reseda Blvd Protected bike lane. While I know most of these battles are local, there are some ideas I have depending on the scale of time we’re looking at. In the long run, I think that there will probably be an effective technological solution like driver-less cars on an automated grade-separated guideway, but that’s still very far off in terms of being a viable option in the next two years. I think that in areas like the San Fernando Valley that we can and should leverage and expand programs like “Safe Routes to School” to help us build out bicycle and skateboard lane networks around and between neighborhood schools to give kids and parents an alternative to driving an SUV half a mile to transport two students. I am a firm believer in the transformative power of education and that all sustainable culture shifts start with the youth, and that education should encourage students to use self-powered modes of travel.

I think a medium-term solutions like updating the California Vehicle Code, CEQA, The CalTrans manuals of style and all other state-level guidelines to make it easier to install protected bike lanes and paving that does something other than just trap heat, be it solar roads or permeable paving that works for our skateboard and kick-scooter riding brothers and sisters would make organizing such efforts easier and more attractive to attempt.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Yes. Improving our pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure is a crucial component of fighting climate change, and using cap and trade funds to do so is eminently logical. We must make our cities more walkable and bikeable not only to reduce our dependence on cars and fossil fuels, but also to improve equity, livability, and community.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

Yes. Our streets must be retrofitted for all of our community members who use them, not just the most affluent and able-bodied who use cars. Our elderly, low-income, and disabled communities rely disproportionately on transit and walking, while youth and low-income communities rely disproportionately on bikes. Complete streets are crucial to meeting the entire community’s needs, and creating complete streets builds more enjoyable communities for everyone, including drivers.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Yes. Bikes are almost always safer when they take up the full traffic lane and when drivers are aware of this being a legal and expected possibility. I also support AB1103 which would make the “Idaho stop” (bicyclers treating stop signs as yield signs) legal in California.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

Yes. My own district includes three of the top five most dangerous intersections in the state in terms of the number of vehicle-related injuries over the past year for which there is data. Speeding near these intersections is a part of the cause, and automated speed enforcement would certainly help reduce these injuries.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

I support creative solutions that benefit poor people. SB 827 is creative, but it is not clear that it will actually support construction of the missing middle housing stock. Even though it would open up huge swaths of land to be developed, but that doesn’t automatically mean affordable housing stock will increase, it could actually lead to gentrification. We need to do something transformative about our housing and transportation situation, and building density around transit is practical on a lot of levels. How it will be implemented is the big issue. If I were in the Assembly, if SB827 made it out of the Senate, I would look into a series of amendments to address local concerns and issues of economic equity.

Candidate campaign page: http://danielbrin.com/

As a self-identified bicyclist, Daniel Brin has first-hand experience with the need for safer streets and better bicycle infrastructure. As a member of the West Hills Neighborhood Council, he worked to communicate Vision Zero Los Angeles’ Education Campaign, and advocated to extend the L.A. River Bike Path into West Hills. Brin’s response to Bike The Vote L.A. displays a commitment to provide for a safer and more sustainable transportation system that shows he would make a strong ally within the California Assembly for the safe streets movement.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: B+

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

First, we need to redouble our efforts to transition from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles charged with energy from renewable sources. (For example, I charge my Volt with energy offset by the solar panels on my house.)

To this end, some of the initiatives to pursue include:

a. A requirement for all gas stations, shopping centers and medium-to-large size restaurants to include rapid-charge stations for electric vehicles. This is especially important on routes radiating from urban centers to alleviate range anxiety for potential drivers of all-electric vehicles.

b. Tax incentives for trucking firms, bus services and ride-sharing fleets to convert to electric vehicles. These incentives can be offset by a carbon tax that also makes electric vehicles more competitive.

c. Strengthen and accelerate mandates leading to eventual prohibition of internal combustion vehicles being sold in the state.

In addition, we need to strengthen and expand mass transit within and between population centers. A rail line over or through the Sepulveda Pass should be one of our highest priorities.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Absolutely, yes. I am a cyclist.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

Yes.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Definitely.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

Speeding is a terrible problem that has caused many deaths in my community of West Hills. I will support any means, including automated speed enforcement, citizen reconnaissance (in cooperation with police) and aggressive prosecution of street racers, to put an end to it.

(Our West Hills Neighborhood Council is actively engaged in the Vision Zero program. We organize youth poster contests and are in the process of funding a wide variety of other projects, including bus bench ads, a bike rodeo at a local park, bike repairs and giveaways through Fleet Street, display of an LAPD “crash car” at our Spring Fest, etc. On my own, I am lobbying RiverLA to extend the River Bike Path along Bell Creek into West Hills and am arranging for a delegation from RiverLA and Gehry Associates to tour our community on March 7. I have been working on this project for several years and am excited to reach this stage.)

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

Yes!

Jeff Bornstein’s response to Bike The Vote L.A. garnered mixed reviews. On one hand he expresses support for bicycles as a viable transportation option, but he also appears to dismiss standard bike lanes. He also focuses concern over bus emissions – rather than the much more significant producer of pollution, emissions from private cars. His commitment to better fund bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure shows that his heart is in the right place, even if we have some reservations about his consistency in support of active transportation issues.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: B

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

I oppose high speed rail, it is an absolute waste of money, and I would put that money towards health care under a single payer health care system. I support any state bond that responsibly puts money into a robust public transportation system. I support most subway construction, such as the Metro Red and Purple lines, and light rail, like the Metro Blue and Gold lines. I also want more buses being used by the public, but not buses that elicit carbon emissions. Buses must be more fuel efficient and energy friendly. I also would push for legislation to create as many bicycle lanes throughout California, and will push for bicycling to be viewed as a legitimate way to engage in daily transportation for everyone, not a niche activity for just bicycle enthusiasts. I will push for more subsidies to reduce the fares for public transportation, which should increase overall ridership.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

I do support  dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. I would want the percentage to be meaningful, and not a token amount. This goes back to my days when I served on the Mayor’s Council on Transportation in the early 1980’s, where I actively explored ways to improve the transportation of bicyclists and pedestrians.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

I support the plan to augment SB 1 to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and public transportation. There are too many cars on the road. They cause tremendous traffic and do major damage with regards to pollution. This is a way to ensure that other forms of transportation besides private use of automobiles will be encouraged. The status-quo will only worsen as more and more people buy and use cars, while the use of public transportation has been dropping.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

I do support the rewording of the laws. Bicyclists need ample room to ride wherever they can in a safe manner. I do not want to see people being injured or killed, so the public must be aware of the reality on these lanes, and no confusion or ambiguity in these laws should be allowed in the future. As an assemblyman, I will work to clear up this situation. As a bicycle rider, I have found the right lanes confining, especially avoiding car doors opening suddenly when a car is parked. Fixing the law can help alleviate this problem.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

I approve of this policy on a limited basis. It should only be placed in areas that are proven to have an abundance of speeders. Also, warning signs should be made on the street prior to the camera area itself. Reducing speed is great, but we have to do it being fully aware of not overstepping our bounds when it comes to our rights and civil liberties. We are aware there is a pilot program in the bay area. The results should give us more information going forward.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

I oppose SB 827. I believe it takes local control away from the people who live there. We want city councils to have a say in their own communities. If I was sure the housing was built near true skeletal transit, than I would be more likely to approve it. I am afraid this bill will be used to build anywhere there is a large boulevard, as opposed to true mass transit. I do think we need more truly affordable housing. I am concerned that too many people cannot even afford a median studio apartment. Supporting expanding rent control expansion is one of my top legislative priorities for California.

Raymond Bishop’s response to Bike The Vote L.A. is inconsistent. He stated that transit systems should be designed to reduce congestion (rather than to provide a quality mobility option) and he failed to accept that speed is a primary factor in the cause and severity of crashes. His goal of eliminating the use of fossil fuels is admirable, but we would hope to see a stronger platform from him in providing safe and efficient mobility options in order to achieve such a goal. 

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: C+

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

I strongly believe that we must protect our health and environment by the total elimination of our use of products derived from fossil fuels.  I would work to see that we continue on the path to ensure that we remove all diesel and gas burning vehicles and eliminate the use of all products that interfere with a clean and healthy environment.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Yes along with any additional funding as needed to support this program.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

Yes, I do not believe the existing system is in our best interest as Vehicle, Bicycle and Pedestrian travel is not compatible due to the varying speeds.  This is an important safety as well as a practical and important public transit problem.  Our transit system must provide for the development of full transit-dependent communities.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Yes; to maximize their visibility and safety; however, the safety of a bicyclist should be a priority. Bicycles and Vehicles do not mix.  Our California law and funding should provide for specific bicycle lanes separate and apart from vehicles.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

No, I do not believe that speed alone is the most common factors in crashes, I believe the difference in speed is the cause along with a lack of focus on driving. I believe that our transportation system is outdated and has not maintained a futuristic outlook to account for greater traffic and other forms of transit. A graduated speed system to allow for commuter flow on the left with slower traffic on the right should be enforced.  We should require that slower traffic move to the right and provide that passing should be in on the left only.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

I believe that transit use should be oriented towards the areas of greatest congestion.  I do not believe it is in the best interest to build housing based on transit systems, but in building transit systems in areas where we now face the greatest congestion first.  Our present experience relating to the reduced use of Metro has demonstrated that this concept has failed and only benefited certain property owners.  Transit should be designed to serve the needs of people and should be designed to reduce congestion to provide the travelers to get to the places they wish to travel to.  It is also important that travel routes are compatible with a quality of life experience in that persons should be able to enjoy traveling especially such as bicycles where a pleasant and scenic experience is available.

Candidate campaign page: https://www.votejustinclark.com/

Justin Clark’s statement to Bike The Vote L.A. offers commitments to provide dedicated funding for active transportation and to clarify the right of people on bikes under traffic code. However, his opposition to SB-1 (the long-overdue state gas tax enacted to fund repairs to California roads caused by drivers) shows that he does not currently have a platform focused on providing a safer and more equitable transportation system.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: C+

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

As a member of the assembly I will work alongside local municipalities to come up with innovative solutions to this problem. One part of the solution is working with community members and professionals to come up with new ideas, the other is speeding up the timeline for already approved projects (such as the electrification of the orange line). I also support subsiding industries advancing technologies towards zero emission vehicles. As that technology advances it will more affordable and practical to integrate seamlessly into out transportation system.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Yes. I also plan introducing measures to increase government transparency and accountability that will offer ways for citizens to easier track the money, and add checks in place for when politicians promise that money will be going to a certain project.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

While this question presents a valid problem I cannot say I support its solution. SB directly hurts low income individuals by increasing gas prices when we already have the second highest gas in the country. In a state going through never growing housing and cost of living crisis SB 1 was a slap in the face of middle and working class Californians. The legislature can find the funding for infrastructure in other ways. I support the immediate repeal of the gas tax.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Absolutely. Something like that should not even be an issue, and the fact it has not been fixed sooner shows one of the many problems of our legislature.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

So long as the technology worked as intended I would support removing the law that allows this to be implemented in California. That said the choice to use automated speed enforcement is then up to local municipalities.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

Affordable housing near highly used transit is one of the pillars that should be used in addressing the housing crisis because it enables those that would actually use public transportation. I would support similar measures so long as they are aimed at the housing crisis. I am not a fan of grouping issues and adding riders to a bill. It kills solutions, spreads disinformation about why a member voted a certain way, and takes advantage of assembly/senate rules.

In regards to construction. State projects, especially those done by Cal Trans, have a reputation of being sloppy and slow. That needs to change. Communities deserve well planned and efficiently executed projects. If elected I will be pushing an independent an audit of ALL California departments.

Assembly District 39 serves northeastern communities of the San Fernando Valley, including Pacoima, Sylmar, Sun Valley, Sunland-Tujunga, Mission Hills, Arleta and San Fernando. Due to the resignation of former Assemblymember Raul Bocanegra in November 2017 related to sexual harassment allegations, the area will see a special election on April 3rd to fill the seat through the end of the current term (December 2018).

The district has relatively high rates of residents who walk and bike as their primary mode of transportation, and it is also has a number of streets and intersections identified in LADOT’s High Injury Network, including two streets labeled as Priority Corridors in need of safety improvements.

Luckily, candidates running to represent this district have a strong understanding of what can be done at the state level to increase access to bike lanes, sidewalks, and improve the safety of everyone.

Considering the large field of candidates in this special election, our AD39 committee decided to provide letter grades for candidates based on their responses and track record, with the possibility of making an endorsement for the special election runoff in June. Individual summaries for responding candidates are listed below, along with a link to each candidate’s full response to Bike The Vote L.A.

2018 CA Special Election Primary: Tuesday, April 3, 7am-8pm
Register to Vote: http://bit.ly/btvregister
Find your polling place: http://lavote.net/locator

AD39 Candidate: Yolie Anguiano

Yolie Anguiano is a familiar and engaged voice within safe streets advocacy in AD39. Anguiano lead the East San Fernando Valley Nature Parkway, providing much needed pedestrian improvements and improved access to open space in Arleta. She is a lifelong resident of the northern San Fernando Valley supplementing her community and volunteer service with work for State Assembly District 39, where she spoke out against alleged sexual harassment by Assemblymember Bocanegra. Anguiano’s response to Bike The Vote L.A. displays a superb understanding of the solutions needed to improve mobility options for Angelenos, including equitable funding of active transportation and full-fledged support for Vision Zero. We are confident that Anguiano will be a passionate advocate for safe streets at the state level if elected.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A

[Click HERE for Yolie Anguiano’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]

AD39 Candidate: Luz Rivas

An engineer by education, Luz Rivas has a track record on safe streets during her tenure as a Public Works Commissioner. She provided support for many projects spearheaded by Pacoima Beautiful (a local advocacy group), including the Pacoima Wash initiative and the Pacoima Urban Greening Plan. As founder of non-profit, DIY Girls, Rivas has experience empowering women that is much-needed in the light of recent sexual misconduct allegations in Sacramento. Rivas’ response to Bike The Vote L.A. shows an excellent approach to improving mobility options in California, including support for complete streets funding and to clarify the rights of people on bikes under the vehicle code. Rivas is an inspiring candidate who has the prospect of being a strong supporter for safe streets within the California Assembly.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A-

[Click HERE for Luz Rivas’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]

AD39 Candidate: Antonio Sanchez

Antonio Sanchez’s excellent understanding of the role that transportation takes in providing, healthy and sustainable communities is heavily informed by his expertise as an urban planner. In his response to Bike The Vote L.A., he highlighted his family’s own experience biking in the San Fernando Valley, noting both the regular harassment from motorists and the lack of cohesive bike infrastructure that is all too familiar to Angelenos who attempt travel by bike. Bike The Vote L.A. appreciates Sanchez’s commitments for equitable funding of active transportation and to improve the vehicle code’s clarity on the rights of people on bikes, which are evidence that he would make a vital supporter of safe streets in the California Assembly.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A-

[Click HERE for Antonio Sanchez’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]

AD39 Candidate: Patrea Patrick

Documentary filmmaker and environmental activist Patrea Patrick identifies as a regular cyclist, and expresses enthusiastic support for more bicycle infrastructure and tax credits for people using active transportation. Her response to our questionnaire didn’t clearly show a depth of understanding of the challenges to provide safer streets within California, but she nevertheless offers a positive platform on active transportation for voters within the northeastern San Fernando Valley.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: B+

[Click HERE for Patrea Patrick’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]

AD39 Candidate: Patty Lopez

Patty Lopez served as Assembly Member for District 39 from 2014-2016 and seeks to take back the seat in this 2018 special election. While Lopez did not establish a track record that was particularly supportive or responsive to local advocacy efforts on safe streets during her assembly term, we are encouraged by her response to our questionnaire, in which she displays a commitment to support a more sustainable transportation system that serves all Angelenos equitably.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: B

[Click HERE for Patty Lopez’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]

Bike the Vote L.A. volunteers made repeated efforts to reach all candidates in this race, but after multiple attempts, the Ricardo Benitez did not respond to our questionnaire. Due to a lack of information about his transportation platforms and his available track record, we gave each him a grade of C-. While Ricardo Benitez did not indicate an opposition to active transportation projects, we are disappointed that he did not respond to our questionnaire.

Candidate campaign page: https://www.yolieanguiano.com/

Yolie Anguiano is a familiar and engaged voice within safe streets advocacy in AD39. Anguiano lead the East San Fernando Valley Nature Parkway, providing much needed pedestrian improvements and improved access to open space in Arleta. She is a lifelong resident of the northern San Fernando Valley supplementing her community and volunteer service with work for State Assembly District 39, where she spoke out against alleged sexual harassment by Assemblymember Bocanegra. Anguiano’s response to Bike The Vote L.A. displays a superb understanding of the solutions needed to improve mobility options for Angelenos, including equitable funding of active transportation and full-fledged support for Vision Zero. We are confident that Anguiano will be a passionate advocate for safe streets at the state level if elected.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

I would move California forward by championing legislation that reduces the use of pollution emitting internal combustion engines. Consequently, there will be less single occupant vehicles on the road, which will curtail our transportation infrastructure costs. I would also strengthen legislation that promotes the benefits of creating healthier neighborhoods. Our children who live or go to school adjacent to freeways are victims of policies powered by the automotive and fuel industry. I will be a watchdog in the Assembly who strengthens the Sustainable Community Act of 2008. California is leading the way for the rest of the nation to follow, but we have a long way to go. I will not support developing more highways which only sustains/increases urban sprawl. Assembly District 39, similar to many other communities of color have been waiting for a leader with the political will to bring home safe and equitable multi-modal transportation system policies. It will enhance the health of all living things. This is where my focus as a legislator will be. I have the vigor to not be in the auto industry or any fuel lobbyist’s pocket.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Absolutely. In my district, children suffer from high rates of obesity and asthma. When the Active Transportation Program is fully funded the well-being of our children will be enhanced. Additionally, these active modes of transportation will create new behavior for children to continue to follow for decades to come. This can be the beginning step to strengthen a new culture that is not dependent on a vehicle for transportation.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

Yes! I’m relieved to know this year Complete Streets became part of the Highway Design Manual. As a legislator I will be paying attention to the funded investment projects that will rebuild our roads to be safe and shared by all users.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Yes. However, when I use a bike to commute on LA streets, I feel safest when there is a protected bike lane. I would champion for our streets to have a network of protected bike lanes similar to Mexico DF’s Paseo de la Reforma.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

Yes, I’m a Vision Zero supporter. I want to strengthen policies that will result in 0 traffic related fatalities. However, on a different note I would want to see equitable citation reform.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

I am for public transit oriented development but since grass-root organizations like: L.A. Community Action Network, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, United Neighbors in Defense of Displacement/ Inquilinos Unidos, Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance, and the L.A. Black Worker Center who fight for the human rights of our most vulnerable populations are against it, I must stand with them. This solution has to include reassurance that it will meet housing demands of the houseless and those who can’t keep up with today’s cost of living. A policy that includes the proper requirements to prevent displacement and secure affordable housing in TODs will have my support.

Candidate campaign page: https://www.luzforassembly.com/

An engineer by education, Luz Rivas has a track record on safe streets during her tenure as a Public Works Commissioner. She provided support for many projects spearheaded by Pacoima Beautiful (a local advocacy group), including the Pacoima Wash initiative and the Pacoima Urban Greening Plan. As founder of non-profit, DIY Girls, Rivas has experience empowering women that is much-needed in the light of recent sexual misconduct allegations in Sacramento. Rivas’ response to Bike The Vote L.A. shows an excellent approach to improving mobility options in California, including support for complete streets funding and to clarify the rights of people on bikes under the vehicle code. Rivas is an inspiring candidate who has the prospect of being a strong supporter for safe streets within the California Assembly.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A-

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

As an assemblymember, I will work to improve access to public transportation in the San Fernando Valley. In the 39th District, my vision is for the East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor to become a reality. The project will include result in a light rail system that will improve transportation options for residents of the East San Fernando Valley. This rail system will connect to other regional transportation systems such as the Metrolink. I will work with local elected officials to help create these sustainable transportation solutions.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

We need to assure that environmental justice communities are benefiting from cap and trade. I support using cap and trade funds to be allocated towards the ATP to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure especially in low-income neighborhoods.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

Our streets should be planned and designed to allow safe access for various mobility modes such as walking and biking. I would support a ‘complete streets’ policy addition to SB1 to assure that the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists are incorporated in street and highway projects.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

The confusion on whether a bicyclist is allowed to use a full street lane needs to be clarified. We need to educated the public and law enforcement agencies to understand that law. I do support re-wording traffic law in a way that till clarify and educate the public of the right of bicyclists to ride safely.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

I would support implementation of automated speed enforcement that assures privacy and civil liberties are met.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

I support transit-oriented housing development. Transit hubs are where it makes sense to build housing and will result in less traffic and an increase in public transportation use. I would work to ensure that not all housing built near public transit is luxury housing. We need Californians of all income levels to benefit from transit-oriented housing.

Candidate campaign page: https://www.antoniosanchezca.com/

Antonio Sanchez’s excellent understanding of the role that transportation takes in providing, healthy and sustainable communities is heavily informed by his expertise as an urban planner. In his response to Bike The Vote L.A., he highlighted his family’s own experience biking in the San Fernando Valley, noting both the regular harassment from motorists and the lack of cohesive bike infrastructure that is all too familiar to Angelenos who attempt travel by bike. Bike The Vote L.A. appreciates Sanchez’s commitments for equitable funding of active transportation and to improve the vehicle code’s clarity on the rights of people on bikes, which are evidence that he would make a vital supporter of safe streets in the California Assembly.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2018 Primary Grade: A-

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. The California Air Resources Board estimates that transportation accounts for 37% of California’s annual carbon emissions. What actions would you take as assemblymember to ensure that California creates a more sustainable transportation system?

As a trained urban planner, I wholeheartedly support building a sustainable transportation system because it improves the standard of living for all residents, including communities of color. The East San Fernando Valley does not score well in the air quality index. With the Interstate 5, the 101 Hollywood freeway, and local highway network passing through the district, every resident lives within three miles of a highway.

The daily traffic congestion has an adverse impact on the health of residents due to gas emissions. Because of the nexus between traffic and adverse environmental impact on residents in my district and throughout Los Angeles, I helped lead the efforts with labor and affordable housing advocates to pass Measure JJJ. This measure incentivizes Transit Oriented Development (TOD) along major public transportation hubs.

As an Assemblymember, I will prioritize additional investment in transit-­‐oriented communities, so we can ensure public transportation becomes a major platform for commuters to reduce gas emissions. I’d also continue working with affordable housing and homelessness groups to ensure transit-­‐oriented communities do not displace low-­‐income Californians or centers for homeless services.

Moreover, although we are an extremely innovative state, most of our vulnerable communities often don’t have affordable access to the clean tech innovation that is helping to drive our economy and fight climate change. I know that AD39 has not received the same amount of monetary benefit and incentives as other more affluent assembly district and therefore still bears a lot of the burden caused by pollution. This must change. I will advocate to increase the amount of Cap-­‐and-­‐Trade dollars invested in AD39, particularly in our disadvantaged and low-­‐income neighborhoods.

2. Cap & trade funds offer a unique opportunity to prioritize sustainable transportation, particularly in low-income neighborhoods negatively affected by pollution caused by cars. Do you support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program to help fund better pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure?

Yes, I would support dedicating a portion of cap and trade funds towards the Active Transportation Program. Even though the City of LA has built 4,821 bike lane miles, I know that it is not enough. Cyclist continue to get into accidents and suffer injuries. There have been multi­‐million dollar settlements paid out by the city to cyclists—millions of dollars that could have been invested in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure while creating safe streets for our residents. As an Assemblymember, I would actively find ways to achieve safe biking and walking infrastructure in our communities.

3. In Los Angeles, low-income communities of color are disproportionately burdened by the impacts of streets designed primarily for cars, without receiving proportional funding for their mobility modes like walking, biking, and public transit. Would you support legislation to add a ‘complete streets’ policy to SB 1, California’s newly augmented gas tax, to require all street and highway projects to incorporate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit-dependent communities?

Yes, I will support. As a teenager, I used to bike around my neighborhood and learned to map out and avoid the dangerous potholes. As a graduate student at UCLA, I used to commute on my bicycle from the San Fernando Valley to UCLA. I learned that commuting on my bicycle would either take the same amount of time or less than driving my automobile. Although not as frequent because of my campaign, my wife, daughter and I, are avid cyclists not just for exercise, but also as a form of transportation. We cycle to the grocery store, the park, and to dinner. We must traverse through unrepaired roads to get to the bike lanes, which in some cases are also in disrepair. It’s an issue that is important to me. Our communities deserve walk-­‐able and bike-­‐able streets. We need to ramp up efforts to prioritize sustainable transportation at the state level.

4. California law regarding the position bicyclists can occupy in a traffic lane is written in a confusing manner. The typical condition – in which the rightmost lane is too narrow for a car and a bicycle to travel safely side-by-side and the bicyclist is thus allowed to use the full lane – is written as an exception rather than the default standard. As a result, despite public information campaigns such as “Every Lane Is A Bike Lane,” there is frequently confusion from the general public and even law enforcement agencies on the legality of bicyclists riding in traffic lanes on California roads. Do you support re-wording traffic law to clarify the right of people on bikes to ride to maximize their visibility and safety?

Yes. I support. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been flipped off, honked at, or purposely and dangerously tailed by an automobile close because I am riding my bicycle in a traffic lane. Sometimes it has happened when my wife, daughter, and I are riding together.

5. A recent study by the National Transportation Safety Board found that speeding was one of the most common factors in crashes, and one of the highest contributors towards fatal crashes. Despite this fact, speed limits across California are consistently raised due to a state law that sets speed limits at the 85th percentile of measured driving speeds. Do you support reform to the 85th percentile rule to give local jurisdictions the ability to set speed limits to better promote safe driving?

Yes. I would support legislation like AB 342 (D-­‐Chiu) to allow pilot programs for ASE to begin and demonstrate to Californians their effectiveness in reducing collisions and traffic fatalities. I’d also be interested in the feasibility of raised junction traffic calming that builds awareness and habits for drivers to slow down at every intersection, which are often the most dangerous places for walkers and cyclists.

6. California’s ongoing housing crisis challenges cities and communities to provide solutions towards meeting California’s demand for housing. Do you support efforts at the state level to accommodate smart growth, transit-oriented development, and sustainable communities that empower residents to get around on foot, by bike, and on quality public transit? What specific policies you would pursue to promote sustainable and affordable living for Californians?

Absolutely. Along with organizations like the LA County Bicycle Coalition, I have been at the forefront of the efforts to build transit-­‐oriented-­‐development. I served in the Build Better LA Coalition, a collaborative made up of organizations with national, statewide, regional, and local expertise engaging in grassroots organizing, community economic development, affordable housing development, public health, environmental justice, and policy and legal advocacy, to pass Measure JJJ.

The measure requires low-­‐cost housing to be included in developments receiving zone changes and General Plan Amendments. It also has a local-­‐hire component to ensure jobs go to members of our communities. As Los Angeles updates its 35 Community Plans, the measure will be a tool that advocates can use to ensure the plans promote affordability in low-­‐income communities. These same requirements need to be incorporated in state legislation to help ensure such construction serves the needs of the communities.